
|
Small Business News November 2006 | Online Edition
Full Cost of Rail Proposal The full costs of the rail proposal are staggering: Other distinguished and authoritative people have warned about cost misrepresentations. Dr. John Kain, Chair Emeritus of Harvards Economics Department, wrote Deception in Dallas, Dr. Don Pickrell, Chief Economist of the U.S Department of Transportations Volpe Center, wrote what is known as the Pickrell Report, Dr. Martin Wachs, Chair Emeritus, Department of Urban Planning, UC-Berkeley, wrote When planners lie with numbers, and there have been many, many others. We have listed twenty of these studies in the footnotes to this article. We cannot say that no one has warned us about misrepresented costs. Our spreadsheet contains no provision for capital costs of any kind beyond the initial costs. Nevertheless, it shows that when the additional 1Ž2 percent GE tax expires at the end of 2021, we will have spent $2.6 billion on interest and suffered operating losses of just over $1 billion and yet we will still owe over $6 billion in outstanding City rail bonds. That is because the tax revenues from the 1Ž2% GE tax are far less than the combination of bond interest and operating losses and so we will have had to issue additional bonds to cover this shortfall. The question is, as Mayor Hanneman is fond of saying, Can we afford it? and Can we maintain it? Top | Home Page | SBH News Index
|